In what way can evidence be subjective despite being considered objective?

Evidence can be viewed as subjective despite being classified as objective primarily based on the interpretations placed upon it. While evidence may come from material facts and concrete data that are objectively measurable, the significance, relevance, and meaning derived from that evidence can vary greatly depending on the perspectives and biases of those analyzing it.

For instance, two different forensic experts might interpret a set of fingerprints or chemical composition found at a crime scene differently, potentially leading to contrasting conclusions. This variation in interpretation is influenced by prior experiences, knowledge, and theoretical frameworks that individuals bring to the analysis of evidence. Thus, while the basic characteristics of physical evidence remain constant, its interpretation can be fluid and subjective, leading to different conclusions in different contexts.