What type of evidence can help to corroborate or dispute a victim's account?

Physical evidence plays a crucial role in corroborating or disputing a victim's account because it consists of tangible objects or materials that can be collected from a crime scene. This type of evidence includes items such as fingerprints, blood samples, weapons, or any other physical objects that can directly link an individual to the crime or provide context to the events as described by the victim.

For example, if a victim claims they were attacked in a specific location, physical evidence such as DNA found at that scene can support their account or, conversely, contradict it if the evidence suggests otherwise. Physical evidence is often considered one of the most reliable forms of evidence because it is objective and can be scientifically analyzed, making it harder to dispute than statements based solely on personal testimony.

Testimonial evidence, while important, relies on the perceptions and memories of individuals and can be subjective or influenced by various factors. Documentary evidence, such as records or agreements, also serves a purpose but may not be as directly linked to the behaviors or actions that occurred during the crime. Indirect evidence may suggest a conclusion but does not directly prove a fact and can be more ambiguous in relation to a victim's claims. Thus, physical evidence is fundamental in establishing the truth behind a victim’s account