When processing a burglarized residence, which point of entry is NOT usually considered?

In the context of processing a burglarized residence, roof access is typically not considered a common point of entry compared to other options. While it is plausible for a burglar to gain access via a roof, it is less frequent than entry through more straightforward points like doors or windows.

Windows and screens, door jambs, and patio doors are all conventional points of entry that burglars often utilize due to their accessibility and the likelihood of being overlooked by security measures. Windows are regularly used as they can be more easily opened or broken, while door jambs are scrutinized for signs of forced entry. Patio doors, often sliding, are also popular entry points that may lack strong locking mechanisms or may be left unsecured.

Thus, in the context of burglary investigations, roof access is generally excluded from consideration because it requires additional effort and presents more risk of detection, making it less appealing to most burglars.